YES 0.811
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/List.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule List
| ((inits :: [a] -> [[a]]) :: [a] -> [[a]]) |
module List where
| import qualified Maybe import qualified Prelude
|
| inits :: [a] -> [[a]]
inits | [] | = | [] : [] |
inits | (x : xs) | = | ([] : []) ++ map (: x) (inits xs) |
|
module Maybe where
| import qualified List import qualified Prelude
|
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule List
| ((inits :: [a] -> [[a]]) :: [a] -> [[a]]) |
module List where
| import qualified Maybe import qualified Prelude
|
| inits :: [a] -> [[a]]
inits | [] | = | [] : [] |
inits | (x : xs) | = | ([] : []) ++ map (: x) (inits xs) |
|
module Maybe where
| import qualified List import qualified Prelude
|
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule List
module List where
| import qualified Maybe import qualified Prelude
|
| inits :: [a] -> [[a]]
inits | [] | = | [] : [] |
inits | (x : xs) | = | ([] : []) ++ map (: x) (inits xs) |
|
module Maybe where
| import qualified List import qualified Prelude
|
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_map(vy30, :(vy40, vy41), ba) → new_map(vy30, vy41, ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_map(vy30, :(vy40, vy41), ba) → new_map(vy30, vy41, ba)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_inits(:(vy30, vy31), ba) → new_inits(vy31, ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_inits(:(vy30, vy31), ba) → new_inits(vy31, ba)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2